What comes back

A few days in Las Alpujarras, at altitude, with the sound of the rio Poqueira running fast below and a cacophony of European birdsong working alongside me. The river has been low for years. This spring it is loud. The valley has not forgotten how to carry water, even after a long drought; it has simply been waiting for the conditions that let it do so again.

It is a useful thing to sit with. Not everything that goes quiet is gone.

We've been thinking lately about work that returns — not in the nostalgic sense, but in the sense of things that come back into view when the conditions are right. A conversation about peer review that refuses the assumption that reviewers are gatekeepers, and asks what happens when we treat them as co-creators instead. A revisited piece on slow scholarship written not as a lament about pace but as an honest account of what becomes possible when a researcher stops sprinting and starts paying attention to what matters. And a short musing on the long tail of a PhD — the conversations that surface five, ten, fifteen years after a thesis is defended, often from people the researcher never met, connected by citations to previously unconsidered, and now related, works.

The thread between them is something like this: the metrics we use to count what a piece of work has done tend to measure what happened quickly. They are poor at noticing what comes back. Research that is genuinely in conversation with the world tends to return, sometimes after a long silence. This is not a flaw in the work. It is a flaw in how we have agreed to measure it.

Radical hope, here, looks less like optimism and more like patience with one's own material. The river does not apologise for having been low. It simply runs when it can. Radically hopeful researchers are often carrying work that has been quiet for a while — a project half-finished, a dataset still unpublished, a question no longer asked aloud. Some of it is ready to run again. Some of it is still waiting. Both are fine.

There is nothing to do with this observation, except perhaps to notice what of your own work is currently quiet, and to resist the assumption that quiet means finished.

DOI: 10.17613/5vace-ec396

Kath Burton

Kath is and always will be radically hopeful about the power of publishing to ignite conversation, community and change.

https://www.radicallyhopeful.org
Previous
Previous

A Creative Act of Service

Next
Next

Wikipedia Citations: Why Academic Engagement Matters Now